Embedded Bulletin | Edition 21 – The NHS is starting to localise accountability faster than it is stabilising delivery capacity
In this latest edition of the Embedded Bulletin, I explore a shift that feels increasingly important across the NHS right now – the system is starting to push operational accountability and pathway delivery further into local systems before many services feel fully stabilised underneath.
The strategic direction itself has not really changed. The NHS still wants more neighbourhood care, more prevention, more integrated delivery and more care closer to home.
What is changing is the pace at which these ambitions are now being operationalised through contracts, local flexibility, accountability mechanisms and delivery expectations.
Across this edition, I look at what that means in practice for General Practice, PCNs, ICBs, neighbourhood models, Advice & Guidance, hospital transformation and wider operational sustainability.
For quick access, click the links below to access the topics of interest:
- What’s new in the world of NHS market access
- PCNs are being pulled in two directions simultaneously
- Neighbourhoods are moving from theory into operational delivery pressure
- ICBs are under growing pressure to prove operational value
- Advice and Guidance tensions continue to expose pathway strain
- Hospitals continue balancing transformation against operational fragility
- General Practice – operational sustainability concerns continue growing
- Mental Health – rising complexity continues colliding with constrained capacity
- Wider developing themes
What’s New In The World Of NHS Market Access
There is still plenty of discussion across the NHS about neighbourhood care, integration and transformation but what increasingly stands out to me is how operational the conversation is becoming.
Over the past few weeks, several developments have started converging around the same underlying issue – the NHS is beginning to push accountability, delivery responsibility and pathway management further downstream into local systems before many parts of the service are ready.
The decision to allow ICBs greater flexibility to vary PCN arrangements locally in support of neighbourhood services is a significant development. It signals that neighbourhood health is starting to move beyond policy language and into practical delivery expectations, with local systems increasingly being asked to shape operational models themselves.
At the same time, ongoing GP Collective Action discussions continue to expose wider concerns about workload, hidden operational demand, unfunded pathway transfer and long term sustainability inside General Practice.
Increasingly, this feels less like a traditional contract dispute and more like a warning signal about the strain sitting underneath the wider NHS operating model.
The NHS is now attempting to operationalise neighbourhood delivery while many parts of frontline care still feel operationally fragile. That creates growing tension between ambition and delivery reality.
The wider message running through these stories is relatively clear – the NHS is starting to localise accountability faster than it is stabilising delivery capacity.
Sources
Embedded Conversations Podcast – Real discussions about what’s shaping the NHS
In the latest episode of Embedded Conversations, Scott is joined by Dr Paul Netts, a GP based in Newcastle and one of the earliest pioneers of delivering hospital services through primary care. Paul explains how general practice subcontracts can improve access, free up specialist capacity and create better pathways for patients, clinicians and the wider NHS.
PCNs are being pulled in two directions simultaneously
Primary Care Networks increasingly sit in an awkward position operationally.
On one side, the NHS continues positioning PCNs as key delivery vehicles for neighbourhood working, integration and multidisciplinary care. On the other, uncertainty remains around funding stability, workforce flexibility and the future shape of PCN contracts themselves.
Several of the latest articles expose that tension quite clearly.
The new practice level reimbursement scheme appears largely focused on salaried GP capacity, while concerns continue around whether ARRS uplifts genuinely reflect the workload and operational pressure now sitting inside General Practice.
At the same time, some commentators are beginning to question whether emerging neighbourhood structures may eventually make parts of the current PCN contractual architecture redundant or at least significantly altered.
What I increasingly see is a system layering neighbourhood expectations, workforce schemes, pathway redesign and integration ambitions onto structures that are themselves still evolving operationally.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational fragility underneath some PCN delivery models.
- The importance of stable leadership and governance.
- The impact of workforce reimbursement limitations.
- The risk of expanding delivery expectations without redesigning underlying operational infrastructure.
What I’m seeing
- More uncertainty around the future role of PCNs inside neighbourhood models.
- Growing concern about workforce sustainability and reimbursement limitations.
- Increased operational pressure around multidisciplinary coordination.
- More questions locally about accountability and contractual flexibility.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether PCNs remain central to neighbourhood delivery long term.
- How funding and reimbursement models evolve operationally.
- Whether local flexibility strengthens or fragments PCN delivery.
- The extent to which workforce schemes genuinely support sustainable capacity.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. PCNs cannot continuously absorb expanded delivery expectations without clearer operational stabilisation underneath them.
For commissioners and ICBs. Neighbourhood ambition will need realistic workforce, funding and accountability models if PCNs are expected to remain core delivery infrastructure.
For commercial and system partners. Understanding local PCN maturity, leadership stability and operational pressure is becoming increasingly important when engaging systems.
Sources
Neighbourhoods are moving from theory into operational delivery pressure
Neighbourhood health continues to dominate NHS strategic discussion but increasingly the conversation is becoming more practical and more difficult.
Most people now broadly agree with the direction of travel – more integrated local care, more prevention, more community delivery and more multidisciplinary working.
The latest discussions around neighbourhood health increasingly focus on governance, relationships, data sharing and operational leadership, a significant shift from earlier neighbourhood discussions which often focused more heavily on structure and aspiration.
There is also increasing recognition that neighbourhood delivery cannot rely indefinitely on goodwill alone.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational complexity involved in neighbourhood delivery.
- The workforce implications of locally variable models.
- The governance burden attached to shared pathway accountability.
- The amount of trust required between organisations to make neighbourhood models function properly.
What I’m seeing
- Greater pressure for General Practice leadership within neighbourhood models.
- More conversations about data and operational integration.
- Growing recognition that long term funding certainty matters.
- Continued uncertainty around specialist roles and pathway accountability.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether neighbourhoods become genuine delivery models or remain strategic overlays.
- How funding stability influences local engagement.
- Whether operational governance matures quickly enough.
- The degree to which data sharing improves pathway coordination.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. Neighbourhood delivery now depends less on structural ambition and more on operational capability, relationships and trust.
For commissioners and ICBs. Short term funding cycles and unclear governance risk undermining neighbourhood maturity before models fully stabilise.
For commercial and system partners. Solutions that simplify operational coordination, improve pathway visibility and reduce delivery friction are increasingly aligned with neighbourhood priorities.
Sources
- What England and Singapore can learn from each other on neighbourhood health
- Delivering proactive, preventive and community services through neighbourhood models
- PCNs and LMCs allies in putting general practice at helm of neighbourhoods
- RCP calls for clearer role for medical specialists in neighbourhood health
- Neighbourhood health will not be delivered by goodwill alone
- Neighbourhood healthcare cannot be delivered without relationships and data
- Neighbourhoods need longer-term funding guarantees
Embedded: How Pharma, MedTech & Device Companies Get Their Innovations Into NHS Pathways - And Keep Them There
My book, Embedded, lifts the lid on how NHS decisions really get made and why so many good ideas fail to gain traction. It gives pharmaceutical, medtech and device teams a practical view of how projects get approved, funded and sustained in the real world.
Drawing on my frontline experience as an NHS Management Consultant, it is designed to help readers understand the system from the inside and engage it more effectively.
ICBs are under growing pressure to prove operational value
The conversation around Integrated Care Boards feels increasingly conflicted. On one hand, the NHS continues asking ICBs to lead neighbourhood development, improve integration, manage performance and support financial control.
On the other, there is growing debate about whether repeated commissioning reform has genuinely delivered the operational improvements originally promised. Reports of restructuring activity and staffing reviews inside ICBs continue to emerge.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational complexity of system leadership.
- The importance of stable organisational capability inside ICBs.
- The tension between national oversight and local flexibility.
- The time required for integrated system leadership to mature properly.
What I’m seeing
- Greater pressure on ICBs to demonstrate operational control.
- More focus on delivery assurance and accountability.
- Continued uncertainty around organisational capacity and future structure.
- Growing tension between national oversight and local flexibility.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether ICBs gain greater operational authority or increasing scrutiny.
- How workforce reductions affect system capability.
- Whether commissioning evolves into more operational system management.
- The extent to which neighbourhood delivery becomes locally variable.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. The next phase of integration probably depends more on operational credibility than further structural reform.
For commissioners and ICBs. Maintaining organisational stability while simultaneously leading transformation will remain difficult under current pressure.
For commercial and system partners. Understanding local ICB maturity and operational confidence is increasingly important when navigating NHS engagement.
Sources
Advice and Guidance tensions continue to expose pathway strain
Advice and Guidance continues to generate significant tension between NHS England, hospitals and General Practice. The original ambition behind A&G was understandable. Used properly, it has the potential to improve patient outcomes earlier, reduce unnecessary referrals, support more pathway based care, reduce wasted patient journeys and improve communication between primary and secondary care.
That potential still exists, but what increasingly stands out is how quickly operational pressure can distort the original purpose when implementation moves faster than pathway redesign. Several of the latest discussions point toward growing concern around referral deflection, repeated referral bounce backs, unclear accountability, hidden workload and increasing pathway friction. NHS England itself appears to be softening some of its original positioning and targets around A&G, which probably reflects growing recognition that implementation complexity matters as much as policy ambition.
Advice and Guidance increasingly sits directly at the intersection between operational flow, referral management, workload transfer, clinical accountability and patient experience. At the same time, consultants themselves are now reportedly warning that poorly functioning A&G models may actually contribute to pathway delays and backlogs rather than resolving them. That matters because it highlights a wider NHS issue - digital process alone does not automatically equal pathway redesign.
What’s being underestimated
- The additional workload generated through poorly designed A&G models.
- The operational burden of repeated referral redirection and “pathway ping pong.”
- The importance of accountability clarity across pathways.
- The impact of pathway friction on workforce morale, operational relationships and patient experience.
What I’m seeing
- Growing concern around referral deflection and repeated pathway bounce backs.
- Increasing recognition that referral management alone is not pathway redesign.
- Greater tension between policy ambition and frontline operational reality.
- Most GPs broadly support earlier specialist input and better pathway integration but are becoming increasingly concerned about workload transfer and fragmented accountability.
- Consultants and primary care leaders both warning that poorly functioning A&G models risk increasing operational friction rather than reducing it.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether A&G evolves into a genuinely collaborative pathway model or remains primarily a referral management mechanism.
- How systems manage workload consequences operationally.
- Whether governance and accountability become clearer across pathways.
- The extent to which patient experience improves or deteriorates through implementation.
- Whether operational friction starts to erode goodwill between organisations further.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. A&G only works sustainably when operational workload, accountability and pathway ownership are designed properly together. Done well, A&G can absolutely improve pathway quality. Done badly, it risks fragmenting accountability, delaying definitive care and increasing operational frustration across both primary and secondary care.
For commissioners and ICBs. Referral management alone is not pathway redesign. Systems increasingly need to measure operational consequences as well as referral activity.
For commercial and system partners. The NHS increasingly values solutions that reduce pathway friction, simplify operational flow and support clearer pathway coordination rather than adding additional process layers.
Sources
- GPs advised to demand consultant GMC number when referral is turned into A&G
- NHS rules out national target to cut GP referrals through A&G
- NHS England to bring GPs on board with Advice and Guidance reforms
- Advice and Guidance adding to backlogs say consultants
- Reliance on A&G risks diagnosis delays and fragmentation says RCP
Hospitals continue balancing transformation against operational fragility
Hospitals remain under extraordinary operational pressure despite ongoing efforts to improve productivity, redesign pathways and modernise delivery. The NHS continues asking acute providers to improve flow, cut waiting times, increase productivity and expand digital capability while many organisations still operate under significant day to day operational strain.
Recent reporting highlights rising concern around cancelled operations, pressure linked to Community Diagnostic Centres (CDCs), continued operational overload and ongoing attempts to modernise hospital delivery through digital redesign. At the same time, examples such as Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust being recognised for digital maturity show parts of the NHS are continuing to innovate despite the pressure. Some organisations are progressing operationally. Others are struggling simply to maintain stability.
The NHS increasingly wants hospitals to function differently, but transformation becomes significantly harder when operational resilience is already stretched. That creates growing tension between recovery, redesign and workforce sustainability.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational fragility underneath performance recovery.
- The workforce impact of sustained pressure.
- The administrative burden created through fragmented pathways.
- The difficulty of transforming services while managing operational overload.
- The inconsistency of pathway reliability and operational co-ordination across the system.
What I’m seeing
- Continued interest in outpatient redesign, virtual pathways, diagnostics closer to home and technology-enabled delivery.
- Greater focus on pathway reliability, operational flow and administrative simplification.
- Recognition that performance improvement does not automatically equal operational stability.
- Systems progressing best operationally tending to simplify delivery rather than layer additional complexity onto already stretched services.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether hospitals can sustain recovery while redesigning care.
- How digital maturity translates into operational benefit.
- Whether hospital avoidance pathways genuinely scale.
- The extent to which operational resilience improves before next winter.
- Whether transformation programmes simplify delivery or unintentionally increase complexity further.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. Transformation programmes increasingly need operational simplification rather than additional structural complexity.
For commissioners and ICBs. Reducing hospital pressure depends as much on pathway reliability and community capability as it does on acute productivity.
For commercial and system partners. The NHS increasingly values solutions that reduce operational burden, improve flow and simplify delivery under pressure.
Sources
The Embedded Seminar – The room where NHS strategy gets translated into action
The Embedded Seminar brings together operational NHS leaders and senior industry teams for a sharp, practical day focused on what is really shaping delivery, decision-making and market access across the system. It is built to go beyond theory, giving delegates the kind of insight, context and straight talking discussion that is rarely available from the outside. For anyone trying to understand what is changing in the NHS and how to respond, it is a high-value day in the right room.
£499.00
Individual Ticket
£499 + VAT
Need A Team Ticket with 10% off? (minimum three delegates) – Contact Us
Attendance is capped at 70 delegates. Venue: Royal College of General Practitioners, London NW1 2FB | 30 September 2026 | 09:00–16:30 This limit is intentional. The purpose of the day is informed discussion at a senior level, not passive listening in a large auditorium. A smaller room has been chosen to allow proper exchange, constructive challenge and a rich learning experience. Once those places are taken, registration will close.
If you would prefer to pay by invoice, simply add your place to the cart and select “Pay by invoice” at checkout. We will then email your invoice with payment details.
General Practice – operational sustainability concerns continue growing
General Practice continues to sit at the centre of almost every NHS operational conversation. Collective Action discussions remain active. Access expectations continue rising. Hidden workload concerns continue growing. At the same time, practices are increasingly being asked to support neighbourhood delivery and wider operational stabilisation across the NHS.
Both activity and expectation continue increasing simultaneously.
Several of the latest articles reflect growing concern around workload, contract dissatisfaction and whether current contractual changes genuinely improve access. There is also increasing debate around how hidden workload is recognised and what future NHS General Practice ultimately looks like operationally.
This matters because General Practice remains one of the main operational stabilising forces inside the NHS. If primary care confidence deteriorates significantly, the consequences spread rapidly across urgent care, outpatient referrals, continuity, prevention and wider pathway flow. The NHS increasingly depends on General Practice carrying additional operational responsibility while simultaneously attempting to redesign wider system delivery.
What’s being underestimated
- The cumulative effect of continual workload expansion.
- The operational impact of hidden work.
- The relationship between workforce morale and pathway stability.
- The amount of administrative complexity now sitting inside primary care.
- The degree to which operational resilience now varies between systems.
What I’m seeing
- Fatigue around continual expansion of expectation.
- Growing concern around workload transfer and hidden operational burden.
- Recognition that General Practice pressure is increasingly about operational complexity, not simply appointment volume.
- Most practices still wanting to support neighbourhood working and integrated care but becoming more realistic about the limits of what can continue being absorbed safely.
- Increasing uncertainty around long term sustainability.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether Collective Action escalates further.
- How access targets influence operational behaviour.
- Whether systems begin recognising hidden workload more realistically.
- The extent to which General Practice continues absorbing additional pressure.
- Whether operational confidence inside primary care continues to deteriorate or stabilise.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. The stability of wider NHS delivery increasingly depends on maintaining operational confidence inside General Practice.
For commissioners and ICBs. Workload transfer without operational support risks destabilising the parts of the system already carrying the greatest pressure.
For commercial and system partners. Solutions that genuinely reduce operational workload and simplify delivery continue gaining traction far faster than those adding additional process burden.
Sources
- Will GPs return to collective action this week?
- GPs vote on NHS offer to avert collective action
- Impossible workload forcing GPs to breach contracts
- Government must recognise and pay GPs for hidden workload says RCGP
- Unnecessary tasks cost average GP practice £500,000 per year
- GPs return to collective action after contract talks fall short
- Restrictive GP contract changes will not boost access
- GPs need to join the table or be on the menu says former BMA chair
- No 10 sets new GP access target
- GPs advised to use tweaked BMA letters to notify ICBs of collective action
Mental Health – rising complexity continues colliding with constrained capacity
Mental Health demand continues rising while systems remain under significant operational pressure to improve access, reduce delays and manage increasingly complex patient need. The most concerning signal for me is how consistently workforce strain, delayed access and pathway pressure continue appearing across different parts of the mental health system simultaneously.
Recent reporting highlights severe workload pressure among mental health nurses, long waits for ADHD assessment, growing concern around access and increasing pressure for wider mental health reform. At the same time, some systems are attempting more ambitious operational redesign around urgent mental health pathways and emergency care integration. That reflects a wider NHS pattern where systems are attempting transformation while simultaneously managing rising operational pressure.
Mental health services increasingly carry rising demand, rising acuity, growing pathway complexity and major workforce pressure, often without equivalent operational expansion underneath them.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational consequences of rising complexity.
- The workforce impact of sustained demand growth.
- The interaction between delayed access and wider system pressure.
- The importance of operational flow across mental health pathways.
- The degree to which mental health operational fragility increasingly affects wider NHS performance.
What I’m seeing
- Increasing concern around workforce resilience and workforce sustainability.
- Growing operational overlap between acute and mental health systems.
- Rising pressure around urgent mental health demand.
- Recognition that much of the operational challenge now sits around workforce capacity and the growing complexity of patient need, not simply access targets.
- Systems making the most progress tending to focus on pathway coordination and operational flow rather than isolated service redesign.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether workforce capacity keeps pace with demand.
- How systems redesign urgent mental health pathways.
- Whether earlier intervention models scale successfully.
- The extent to which neighbourhood models support prevention and earlier support.
- How mental health pathway pressure increasingly interacts with wider NHS operational fragility.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. Mental health operational resilience increasingly affects wider NHS system performance, not simply specialist services.
For commissioners and ICBs. Pathway coordination and workforce sustainability remain as important as access improvement targets.
For commercial and system partners. The NHS increasingly values solutions supporting operational flow, earlier intervention and pathway coordination under pressure.
Sources
- Four fifths of UK mental health nurses say workload unmanageable
- Long waits for child ADHD assessments impacting mental wellbeing
- Expanding access to NHS talking therapies could tackle joblessness
- Mental health reform is becoming urgent
- Centre for Mental Health urges election candidates to back mental health pledge
- Region declares bid to eliminate A&E mental health waits
Wider developing themes
Prevention, community pharmacy, diagnostics closer to home, medicines optimisation and digital delivery models continue moving steadily forward across the NHS.
What links many of these developments together is the continuing attempt to intervene earlier, reduce avoidable escalation, improve operational flow and shift care into lower friction settings.
But what increasingly stands out is how difficult it remains to operationalise those ambitions consistently while managing immediate financial and workforce pressure.
What’s actually happening
The latest articles highlight rising concern around medicines costs, ongoing workforce reduction inside NHS England, continued debate around prevention investment and wider pressure around affordability and operational prioritisation.
What’s being underestimated
- The operational complexity behind prevention models.
- The impact of financial pressure on long term investment.
- The scale of workforce reduction occurring centrally.
- The difficulty of scaling innovation consistently across operationally fragile systems.
What I’m seeing
- Continued movement toward community and pharmacy based delivery.
- Greater interest in diagnostics closer to home.
- Increasing operational focus on affordability and productivity.
- Growing realism about financial constraint across the NHS.
What to watch / what this means in practice
- Whether prevention investment survives short term operational pressure.
- How quickly pharmacy and community models scale.
- Whether digital transformation genuinely simplifies delivery.
- The extent to which affordability shapes operational decision making.
Practical implications
For NHS leaders. Operational sustainability increasingly depends on balancing long term redesign ambitions against immediate delivery realities.
For commissioners and ICBs. The challenge is increasingly about sequencing operational change realistically under financial pressure.
For commercial and system partners. The NHS continues prioritising solutions that improve operational reliability, affordability and pathway efficiency simultaneously.
Sources
Summary
Across all of these stories, the common theme is operational maturity. The NHS is increasingly trying to move from strategic ambition into delivery execution. What increasingly stands out to me is that many parts of the NHS still feel operationally fragile while simultaneously being asked to redesign care at pace. That tension now sits underneath much of the current conversation around General Practice, neighbourhoods, PCNs and ICBs.
The next phase of NHS reform probably will not be determined by policy documents alone. It will be determined by whether systems can make redesigned pathways function reliably in practice, under pressure, at scale.
Final thought
Where I continue seeing friction, it is often because policy ambition has moved faster than workforce, contracts, funding or implementation reality. The next phase of NHS change will probably not be determined by strategy documents alone. It will increasingly be determined by whether systems can make redesigned pathways function consistently in practice, under pressure, at scale.
For those working inside the NHS, that operational pressure is already very visible. For those working alongside it, the challenge is becoming clearer too. The question is no longer simply whether something aligns with NHS policy. Increasingly, it is whether it helps the system operate more safely, sustainably and predictably within constraint. As ever, if you are seeing something different locally, or think I’ve misread the direction of travel, I am always open to challenge.
Get the next Embedded Bulletin straight to your inbox
If you want to stay close to the issues shaping NHS delivery, market access and decision-making, sign up to receive email updates when the next Embedded Bulletin is published. Stay in front of the competition and get practical insight on what is changing, what matters and what to watch next.
Sign up to our newsletter
Turn Strategy into Progress. Faster.
Scott McKenzie helps pharmaceutical, medtech and device companies cut through NHS complexity and get their offers in front of the right decision-makers. In 2023, he helped launch 53 new NHS projects – and added another 28 in 2024. Behind those numbers is a system-level understanding of what actually gets approved, funded and sustained.
He’s also the author of the groundbreaking book Embedded – a practical, insider’s guide to landing projects with the NHS and making them stick.
His newly launched coaching and mentorship membership programme is built for results: combining NHS insider insight, proven engagement strategies and warm introductions to the people who hold the pen on purchasing decisions.